This Decade Belonged To China

This decade belonged to China. So will the next one.

Martin Jacques

The west is still finding it extraordinarily difficult to come to terms with China’s remarkable ascent

‘China has proven itself to have a formidably innovative economy.’ Xi Jinping proposes a toast at the welcome banquet for the Belt and Road Forum in Beijing, 26 April 2019. Photograph: Reuters

By 2010, China was beginning to have an impact on the global consciousness in a new way. Prior to the western financial crisis, it had been seen as the new but very junior kid on the block. The financial crash changed all that. Before 2008 the conventional western wisdom had been that sooner or later China would suffer a big economic meltdown. It never did. Instead, the crisis happened in the west, with huge consequences for the latter’s stability and self-confidence.

Every year for the past decade, China, not the US, has been the main source of global economic growth. In 2014, according to the World Bank’s international comparison program, the Chinese economy overtook that of the US to become the world’s largest, measured by purchasing power parity. Although China’s growth rate over the past decade has declined to its present 6.2%, it is still one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. Today its economy is more than twice as big as it was in 2010.

This is the story, as pertaining to the past decade, of the most remarkable economic transformation in human history. Unsurprisingly the west is finding the phenomenon difficult to come to terms with, displaying a kaleidoscope of emotions from denial, dismissal and condemnation to respect, appreciation and admiration; though there is presently much more of the former than the latter. The rise of China has provoked an existential crisis in the US and Europe that will last for the rest of this century. The west is in the process of being displaced and, beyond a point, it can do nothing about it. China’s rise is one of those world-transforming changes that occur very rarely in history. And only during this past decade has the west begun to realise that China’s rise will, indeed, change the world.

The story keeps moving. Five years, let alone a decade, ago, China was synonymous with cheap manufacturing. The west believed that China would for long remain essentially defined by imitation, unable to match the west’s capacity for innovation. But China has proven itself to have a formidably innovative economy. Shenzhen has come to rival Silicon Valley – while Huawei, Tencent and Alibaba can be counted in the same league as Microsoft, Google, Facebook and Amazon. Far from this being a product of copying, the Chinese are increasingly engaging in groundbreaking innovation: China accounted for almost half of all patent filings in the world last year. But why should we be surprised? People living in a country growing at 10% per annum for 35 years and between 6% and 8% for the past decade are used to rapid change and constant innovation. And don’t forget that China is an extraordinarily rich and intellectually endowed civilization that has always been hugely committed to learning and education.

Perhaps the starkest demonstration of China’s growing influence has been the belt and road initiative – a global network of Chinese-financed highways, railways, ports and energy infrastructure, launched in 2013. The ambition is no less than the transformation of the Eurasian landmass, home to more than 60% of the world’s population. More than 140 countries, overwhelmingly from the developing world, have now signed up; and the great majority were represented by their leaders at the belt and road summit held in early 2019, a level of representation no other country could match, the US included.

With the present international system entering its twilight, the belt and road initiative can be seen as the embryo of a new order, not in the literal sense, but symbolically. First, with the predominance of the developing world, representing 85% of the world’s population; and second, in the overriding priority given to development, hugely important to the developing world but which barely features on the west’s agenda.

For more than four decades the relationship between China and the US was relatively benign. Donald Trump’s election in 2016 marked a turning point. His hostility towards China, however, is far from unique. It is bipartisan. And not unpredictable. At root the new US attitude is based on a fear that China represents a threat to its global hegemony, something that many Americans regard to be part of the country’s DNA. This fear has in part been stimulated by China’s increasingly proactive role on the global stage, most notably with the belt and road initiative, along with the formation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, to which Britain was the first non-Asian signatory.

The US’s increasing unwillingness to support the international system that it largely created – as seen in Trump’s attitude towards the World Trade Organization and Nato – marks a retreat. It is already clear that Trump’s trade war against China has not achieved its objectives. Nor will its tech war against China: Huawei’s 5G will prevail in much of the world, probably including most of Europe. As US-China relations continue to deteriorate, and begin to look like a new cold war, it will be no replica of the last cold war. Then, the US was on the rise, the USSR in decline: this time the US is patently in decline and China very much on the rise. Whereas a singular characteristic of the last cold war was military competition, China has historically never competed as a military power and its rise – compared with the aggressive expansionism of the US, UK, France and Germany in their equivalent stages of development – has been remarkably restrained.

The next decade will see a continuing fragmentation of the western-centric international system, together with the growing influence of Chinese-oriented institutions. The process will be uneven, unpredictable and, at times, fraught – but ultimately irresistible.

PDF Document: This decade belonged to China

Client Letter – The Year That Was

It is that time, when we look back at what was and perhaps what might have been. From an investment point of view it will depend on your point of view – whether you were invested outside or inside South Africa.

Locally we continue to suffer from the legacy of bad politics and continue to be fed empty promises. Our structural fractures are so deep that mere tinkering will not mend our broken economy. Perhaps the only positive (if one can even think of it in those terms) is that it is no longer possible to hide from the truth and the barrel has been scrapped bare, with little to no money to throw at the problem. This has forced closure or privatization of State Owned Enterprises onto the table, but even this is done reluctantly and with continued political pandering to narrow interest groups. There are solutions to our problems, but a lack of political will. With most of the population now reliant on either government grants or government employment, to hold onto power means to hold onto a socialist ideology that is so evidently failing. Our massive population of unemployed will desperately cling onto every word of rhetoric that promises better times through redistributing from the “haves” to the “have nots”. I think it is Margaret Thatcher who said that “the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money”. We have run out of other people’s money and many of the “other people” have run for the hills and taken their money and skills with them. We must always have a social conscience, but to drive such an agenda requires wealth creation. Our policies do not provide such a platform.

The irony is that the Rand has only depreciated by a relatively small amount. Perhaps it is because it is already so weak, but given all the bad economic news it is curious that it has maintained at these levels. Our relatively high real interest rates still appear to offer attractive returns for foreign investors, but I fear that this situation can quickly reverse. Already there have been big portfolio outflows, but a Moody’s downgrade (which seems inevitable) will likely cause an even greater outflow – although it is hard to believe precautionary measures have not already been taken through a gradual exit by foreign investors.

Those clients who are invested locally or are forced to do so through Pension Fund Regulations, have received disappointing returns, not only over the past year, but for a number of years now. Quite frankly, you would have been better off in cash (although tax then takes away a big chunk of this). Whilst in any situation there will be pockets of opportunity and one should not be blind to the possibilities, I continue to feel that for the most part you will be better served by being invested offshore.

The USA continues to dominate globally. Their economy is strong, unemployment at historic lows and wage growth solid. 2018 was somewhat negative as the White House waged its trade war and at the end of the year partially shut down government in protest over a lack of funding for a wall along its southern border. However, markets rebounded in 2019 and it has been a very good year with the S&P likely to end close to 30% up in USD. There is now agreement in place to end the trade war with China as well a new agreement with Canada and Mexico for a free trade zone. This will take some of the uncertainty out of markets and I feel there is still upside and that the USA will remain a force for a long time to come. This has been and continues to be my preferred destination for investments.

Asia is the future, with China likely to surpass the US economy. For long the East has been the manufacturing hub of the world, but with time its own consumer base has grown. China and India alone account for about a third of the world’s population. This new middle class has enormous purchasing power not only for computers and cell phones, but for small luxuries such as coffee and toothpaste as well. The share portfolio I have been strongly recommending taps into this potential. There are challenges in this region and markets are volatile, but fundamentally this is not a region to be ignored by the long term investor. Even the USA recognizes its force and I believe have taken the “trade war action” to try stem the advance. This is however futile and Asia will come to be the dominant region economically. Returns have not been bad at all this year, except India which has lagged. The resolution of the trade war should boost markets again. I like the region as a whole, particularly China and India where the huge populace will drive consumerism. The exception is Japan, where a declining population will weigh on returns.

Europe offers pockets of opportunity, but on the whole it too has structural problems which will weigh on returns.

I continue to encourage offshore investment, with the USA and Asia my preferred destinations. This strategy has served well in the past and I believe will continue to do so in the future. There will be peaks and troughs on the way, but structurally I believe these regions offer the best prospects for growth and for the long term investor.

I guess my letter does not exactly exude local Christmas cheer, but for the foreign investor there is much to cheer about. If you are reading this letter you likely have the good fortune to consider such worldly problems as to where to invest your savings and if you enjoy good health then that is perhaps all we can ask for.

I wish you all a blessed Christmas and a healthy 2020, with good returns for that added joy.

China Hits Back

China hits back at Trump with weaker yuan, halt on crop imports.

Chinese currency falls to its weakest in a decade.

After trying to placate Donald Trump for more than a year only to face tariffs on virtually all its shipments to the US, China is signalling it’s ready to play hardball.

Read More

Client Letter – Much Ado About Nothing

The South African elections have come and gone and nothing has really changed. Yes, the ANC’s share has been cut a bit, but they still have a healthy margin of victory. It is quite disappointing that a government can fail on so many fronts, yet receive blind loyalty from a base that protests in all forms, except at the ballot box.

Read More